Sunday, October 29, 2006

Lesson #3: How Self-Publishing is Ruining a Generation of Black Writers


Or:

Why I Am a Much Better Writer Than Omar Tyree. And Why Omar Tyree Is a Much Better Business Man Than I Am.



In 1994, I came back to Philly after a year traveling through Europe and Africa as a Thomas J. Watson Fellow. It was a far from triumphant return: I was heartbroken about leaving a London that I adored, had just ended a disastrous eight-month relationship, and had nothing lined up for my future. I landed back in Philly broke and depressed, and went from continent jumping to working as an underpaid temp at the electric company.

My sole plan for salvation during this time, for rescue, was to write a novel, then use the money from its sale to return back to my former life in Brixton, the one I was forced to leave behind. I had never written a novel before, nor published anything else. I wasn't intending on writing anything too edgy, just something commercial enough to get me one of those phat publishing advances I'd been reading about. My intended novel would have a lot of hip hop, some violence, sex, all the stuff that sells. Nothing too demeaning: something like the movie Juice, but as a book.

For the entire year, I worked on this project. I obsessed over it. I worked on it at breaks at work. I became depressed if I wasn't producing on it, and obsessed over page counts as if the day I wrote page 200 I would magically be beamed back to my old life in South London.

Still, despite my desperation, the more I wrote, the more I remembered how much I loved literature. The more I wrote, the more I wanted to be a real writer and not just a cynical profiteer. So about halfway in, I started trying to write something that was actually good. That wasn't false stereotypes and cliches, bullshit archetypes and slang. I started to try and write something that reflected my reality, comprised of real emotion and honesty.

Eager to get it moving, after I reached page 200 I had the thing bound at Kinkos and sent to the literary agent of a friend of mine. After that day, whenever I left the house I checked my voicemail obsessively, waiting for the call from the agent that would serve as my reprieve. Finally, I did get a call. The agent wanted to talk.

I went up to NYC on the Amtrak from Philly, so eager that I showed up at the agent's office a half hour early. Then the agent and I went out to lunch at a fancy restaurant in the Village. Mariah Carey and Tommy Motolla were at the next table, not talking to each other. They were divorced a month later, I think.

There at the table, in a rushed aside, the agent told me:

"Half of the writing in your book is really good, fantastic. But the other half is just horrible. Just complete shit."

"I totally agree. I know that now. That's why I'm going to go back and rewrite that first half completely and-"

"What? No, no. That first half is great: really gritty, really urban. It's the second half that's horrible. It's dull pretentious crap. That's what needs to be changed."

I was heart broken. My dreams of a major publisher seemed squashed. Not wanting to be a literary coon, I ignored the agent's advice. I worked even harder to try and make the manuscript the way I wanted it. I called the book White Chocolate Melts: I tell you that because I think that sums up just how fucking awful the thing was. It was hopeless. I learned a lot about being a writer when I finished trying to edit the thing, but no agent was interested in that book, let alone a major publisher. With my options running out, I walked away from it.

What I realized though, in the months ahead, was that the agent had been right: I was good enough to write shitty commercial pulp, but I didn't have the skills to write a serious work of literature. To get those skills, I applied to an MFA and began my own program of reading and writing. I started the long, still ongoing process of trying to grow as a writer.

For the next four years, my energy went into pushing my craft, raising my skill level, and generally becoming a good enough writer that mainstream publishing had to open its doors for me. The result was I become a much stronger writer, and eventually sold a novel to a major house.

Now, all this first happened in '95. The self-publishing craze was in its infancy, with writers like Omar Tyree just starting to make noise as they found success first as self-published authors. The World Wide Web had barely happened, and self-publishing sites like iUniverse didn't exist yet, let alone the print-on-demand technology that was just around the corner. If I had hit my wall just three, or even two years later, all of those self-publishing options would have been available to me. As desperate as I was, I don't know if I would have said no to the idea. I don't think I would have known to. At the time I was working on that book, I actually considered it good enough to be published. I might have jumped at any opportunity not to take "No" for an answer.

If I had chosen to self-publish, that four years would have been spent on learning book marketing, promotion, publicity, audience identification, and all of the other many aspects of the publishing world. My time would have been spent traveling around with boxes of books in the back of my car, hand selling the thing to black bookstores and barbershops and churches, attending every cheesy promotional event I could find just to get White Chocolate Melts out there, no matter how flawed it was. I would have created press packets and done mailings and been out there schmoozing, trying to sneak my way onto every local TV and radio station I could find.

And at the end of that four years, I would probably have several books, having written them in a month or two to expand my product line. And with no real time for craft and my attention completely focused on the market, each would have sucked roughly as much as the first one. Having spent the bulk of my energy on the commerce instead of the art, I would have remained the same shitty writer I was when I started. The moment I chose to self-publish, I would have ceased to make substantial growth. I would have virtually calcified.

This might sound like conjecture, but it's not. I say this because I saw a generation of black writers fall into this trap, authors that could have been original voices that added to the canon, who instead became literary canon fodder. They went pop, blew up, and then almost instantly started vanishing, their worth dwindling with their sales.

Sadly, instead of working actively on getting better, many of this crew instead try to falsely justify the merit of their work. Just like it was impossible in the early 80s to find a disco band that admitted being a disco band, it is rare to find a black commericial writer that will admit that they are a commercial writer. Instead, they often try to argue that their work represents the best of African American literature, on par with Ellison, Baldwin and Morrison. It would be funny, if it wasn't so sad. And so insulting to those writers they claim to emulate.

Sincerely,

Mat Johnson
www.niggerati.com

Next Up:
Lesson #4: How the Black Commercial Fiction Boom Can Save American Publishing

Labels:

20 Comments:

Anonymous said...

Greetings from Tayari's website :))) - You know what, I really dig your style - I found this article engaging and entertaining. I loved the Montolla/Carey observation.

I agree with you all the way about this self-publishing boom. Because it is fairly easy and accessible - rather than grow or take a good hard look at their writing - people are saying - "Yeah, I'm looking for a deal but if that don't work out I'm just going to publish it myself."

Failure forces us to grow, learn, change. Without it we stay the same. (I just made that up off the top of my head :)

Self-publishing is a great move for the hustle of it all but as far as the art form it's hurting us...

And Yeah, I self-published my collection - but unlike all those other self-published authors, my work really is the shizark!!! lol.

I recently completed my first novel - which I am working like hell to tighten up and all that great stuff - I have an agent for it and hopefully soon after my edits are complete I'll have a PHAT deal. I'm writing what I know and that seems to work for me - so it's a bit street - but in a literary sort of way ;)

I talked enough so now I'm going to go and read the rest of your blog entries...

Tinesha

www.MagicPeoplePress.com

8:21 AM, November 10, 2006  
Anonymous said...

If there was a videocam attached to my computer you would have seen a former public teen librarian salute your commentary with a standing O. I am SO sick of seeing this ghetto/urban lit novella movement being promoted as the new "real" black voice for African American adults as well Young Adult readers that I could lit a match inside a library! I tell my colleagues that I am proud to be called a literary snob if it means that I expect the novel to be well-written and edited with a coherent plot and dialogue. Why should our we be subjected to poor writing and storytelling in a trade off to encourage them to read stories with characters set in the 21st century? Particularily among our teen readers. The trend that we as public and school librarians were seeing was that voracious-reading black kids were seeking out books by adult authors like Omar Tyree, Eric Jerome Dickey, Zane etc. for recreational reading. Black teens were tired of reading literature about the antebellum south or Harlem circa 1960-80's that appear on their school reading lists. (And I have to admit that I too was growing tired of handing them new novels by Walter Dean Myers)The pickings for "safe" books on school readings lists were slim for titles with leading contemporary African American characters. It's no wonder that kids are now running to pick up urban/ghetto lit books. With glossy contemporary-looking covers that reflect the latest trend in hip-hop music, you've sold them before they've even read the story. And now rappers like Snoop Dog are now branching out from their dog collar business and getting into the literary game?! WTF?! Oi Vey!

Granted, you and some of my author friends are not writing specifically for a teen audience, but colleagues like me do try to promote well-written titles featuring African American 20 something year-old protagonists that don't appear in VOYA or School Library Journal as YA books as an alternative to the genre that is out there now being billed as the new black literature. I'm not saying that I wouldn't order ghetto lit titles because I try not to practice censorship but you best believe that other great literary works will be strategically placed nearby. It'll be in the collection alright but I sure won't be in a rush to replace the missing copy.

Signed former YA Librarian tired of the Ghetto Lit drama

11:42 AM, November 10, 2006  
Mat Johnson said...

Tinesha- Ain't no shame in your game. The larger point, which you get, is that we have to keep pushing ourselves as artists. That we have to refuse to settle for mediocrity. Ultimately, who prints our words is just symbollic. Best of luck on your path.

Librarian-
You bring up a lot of really important points about the literary market place, and the state of African American literature. I'm going to integrate them into my next big post, to give them full play. Thanks!

4:13 AM, November 11, 2006  
Paula Puryear said...

Mat,

Fantastic post. I'm a screenwriter and have been working hard on a new screenplay for longer than is considered advisable. Although I've had past successes, my goal is not just to work but to write beautifully and tell stories that pack an emotional and thematic punch. In this parallel universe, I often hear people say that if their movie project doesn't sell they'll shoot it independently -- to my eyes, the film equivalent of self-publishing. Most of the films that are true independents never get distribution precisely because they're not good enough to attract an audience. In the film world, people who aren't succeeding often think that it's because their work is too deep, meaningful, etc. fo the commercial marketplace, but the success of "small" films like Capote, Crash, etc. proves that quality work will attract an audience. I'm a believer that if you can't get a film made or a book published through traditional channels, the first place you should look for an explanation is to the work itself. Of course, the marketplace will and does reward pablum, it also rewards fully realized work. Congratulations on your commitment to the work. It encourages and inspires me.

11:04 AM, November 13, 2006  
Mat Johnson said...

Paula,

That's an interesting point, I never thought of indie filmaking in that light. Just yesterday I became frustrated with the pacing of a script's approval and had the exact same urge to do it on my own, visions of digital filming and iMovie in my head. You're totally right.

6:46 AM, November 14, 2006  
lee said...

This post has been removed by the author.

4:07 PM, November 26, 2006  
Lee Goldberg said...

Great post, Mat. That's the real danger posed by these vanity presses -- besides the emptying of a gullible writer's bank account. The self-publishing companies are also robbing the writer of the experience that's required to become a successful writer (and part of that is learning to deal with, and learn from, rejection). Too many aspiring writers fall for what appears to be "the easy way" rather than accept the fact that their books are unpublishable and that they have a lot more work to do on their writing. They don't want to work. They want a book now. Or at least the illusion of one. But it's a career-sabotaging move...not to mention stupid and expensive.

4:10 PM, November 26, 2006  
Mat Johnson said...

Thanks Lee-

I didn't even think about the money aspect, you're right. I guess by now there is a whole industry out there ready to take advantage. Somebody should call 60 Minutes.

MJ

6:03 PM, November 26, 2006  
Jenna Glatzer said...

Great post, Mat. Thanks for writing it. And yep, there's a whole industry jumping all over writers' dreams. Some pretty honest POD companies, some totally dishonest. Check out the "Bewares and Background Check" board here if you get a chance-- you'll get a real education on what happens when vanity publishing goes bad: http://www.absolutewrite.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=22

9:57 PM, December 05, 2006  
Anonymous said...

So glad I stumbled upon your blog on this topic because I agree 1000%.

When I first began considering trying to get my work published, I looked at self publishing. For a period of time I seriously considered going that route. I was saving up my pennies and everything. But at the end of the day I didn't do it -- mainly because I really wanted to know if I was any good. I didn't just want to publish a book and see if I could translate that into a deal with a big publishing house and a fat advance. I wanted to know if I could write. I wanted to know if I could get a publisher, who reads a lot of people's work, to consider my work in a positive light. I wanted to know that for myself, and if I self-published, I would never know. So I threw the self publishing brochures away, and began mailing my book out to small presses. And one of them took my book, which comes out in January.

And as you said, the rejection I have suffered has helped me improve my writing tremendously. I am so very glad that I didn't self publish -- I wouldn't trade the experiences I've had going the long way for anything.

--Tula

8:46 PM, December 13, 2006  
Shamontiel said...

Although I do understand where you're coming from in regards to writers trying to get an instant hustle by self-publishing instead of going through the regular process, there are SO many entrepeneurs who have become successful by branching out on their own. I'm currently reading "Display of Power: How FUBU Changed a World of Fashion, Branding, and Lifestyle" and the founder consistently talks about how if he had the experience of dealing with the fashion design industry, he'd have NEVER pursued it as far as he did, but with drive (and money owed), he kept it moving. There are so many self-published authors who have done the same. I hate it when people assume that SPAs are bad writers, have stacks of books in their garage, and made no profit. I will agree with you on the editing part though. I am a professional Copyeditor, but I was hired for this job a month AFTER I published my own book. In that timeframe, my copyediting skills have improved quite a bit...enough to get a raise, so works for me! But I do not regret self-publishing. I feel that if an author is good enough and skilled at his/her craft, he/she wouldn't be so concerned with what the next person is doing.

8:24 AM, March 06, 2007  
Shamontiel said...

But in addition to that, I will admit that my own book could've been copyedited much better had I waited a little time. But, with all of the readers that have commented on and off Amazon.com, etc., not ONE has said that the few typos they saw took away from the book. I've ready clean books from publishing companies that SUCKED. Don't assume that just because a book is with a major publisher that it is automatically good; that just means that it is marketable. Amazon reviews will lay out plain as day that every book from a major publisher does not make a reader an instant fan. Again, don't worry about the next person's mission when you should be more concerned with improving your own. Too many people get caught up in the "If I did it, you should too" mindset. There's no need to be. It's unnecessary. It makes you look insecure.

8:28 AM, March 06, 2007  
Mat Johnson said...

Good points, on the business end. It is possible to make a profit. That's the thing though, I don't really care about the business part of it. I don't care about entreprenurial ventures in writing. I don't care about getting rich off books, or see that as the mark of a good writer. I just care about the writing itself. I'm not concerned with typos, but the quality and originality of the prose, ideas, and storytelling. And I think the self-publishing route has gotten in the way of many writers' artistic growth. Sadly, I've never read a contemporary self-published book that was as well written as I thought could have been. I haven't read yours though, or most of them. There are a lot out there.

As for the "mind your own business approach to writing," there we disagree. I think we, as writers, as readers, should be critical of our literary legacy. Not unfair, not cruel, but honest and critical. What is good writing has to be defined, and hopefully heralded. Not only is there no shame in it, criticism is essential to artistic growth. It is an artist's responsibility, one fulfilled by all of our greatest practitioners: Hughes, Wright, Ellison, Morrison, Baraka, pretty much every major writer of the last century.

11:36 AM, March 06, 2007  
Shamontiel said...

How convenient it was of you to email me personally to say that you'd link my rebuttal blog but then block my email address? Wow, is debate really that essential, or were you looking for a bunch of bandwagon folks to agree with you? I, for one, refuse. Here's the link! http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=143731680&blogID=237971611&Mytoken=9EC2D8F5-6014-4DCB-89E09B9F205CDCAA8034565

1:19 PM, March 06, 2007  
Mat Johnson said...

Thanks for writing the impassioned rebuttal, I've been hoping there would be more dialogue on this issue.

I know you take issue with my opinions, but please don't let that lead you to jump to accusations based on an email error. As you can see, I'm very accessible.

3:32 PM, March 06, 2007  
lovemelikethat said...

I ended up here by mistake today...so glad I did.

The parts of my soul that need to write and publish have been placed in secret compartments in dusty drawers that languish in dressers relegated to holding old cans of paint in a musty garage.

Dare I even weave my way through the old promise, and haunting calls? Maybe late one night; maybe on a long drive across country, where there is enough distance between my everyday and the dreamscape I have to inhabit to peek at the writing.

Maybe the voices will chase me home, or I'll have to pull over to a roadside diner and use a table dispenser's worth of napkins in lieu of a writing tablet or lined paper, surprised to come to life in, say, Missouri.

Oh, your post: [audio up] Clap, clap, [voiceover:] mm hmm, mm hmm.

Once, while in a bookstore with a new friend, she picked up a few books by some contemporary Black authors and said, "See, I used to read, I used to read all the time. I used to read [this work] by [this author]."

I was so shocked, not knowing how to say that I would never consider that work literary material, and that I had never had an interest in reading it. Later I asked myself why I'd never read 'that type of work,' and realized that it simply never appealed to me. Nor does much of what gets passed around as authentic Black portrayals in television, film, music, fashion.

This post , and the many comments and perspectives here, are part of the wonderful dialogue that we are having now, on the Web, that shows how diverse and large our 'community' is.

That is such a good thing.

5:35 PM, March 10, 2007  
Maroonsista said...

You said: And I think the self-publishing route has gotten in the way of many writers' artistic growth.

I say: What makes you think that it is self-publishing that gets in the way of a writer's growth? Do you think that somehow writers magically mature because they have a publisher's name at the end of it? Does that mean Langston Hughes, Zora Neale Hurston, Zane, Omar Tyree, and any other self-published writer (at one point and time) had no growth just because they decided to take full responsibility for their books in the beginning? Each writer is different. It is easy to blame it on self-publishing instead of blaming each individual writer for their own creative responsibility.

9:46 AM, March 11, 2007  
Shamontiel said...

You said: And I think the self-publishing route has gotten in the way of many writers' artistic growth.

I say: What makes you think that it is self-publishing that gets in the way of a writer's growth? Do you think that somehow writers magically mature because they have a publisher's name at the end of it? Does that mean Langston Hughes, Zora Neale Hurston, Zane, Omar Tyree, and any other self-published writer (at one point and time) had no growth just because they decided to take full responsibility for their books in the beginning? Each writer is different. It is easy to blame it on self-publishing instead of blaming each individual writer for their own creative responsibility.

9:50 AM, March 11, 2007  
Shamontiel said...

By the way, I did see the obnoxious opening, but it was a little like someone telling me a train going 100 mph is not loud. I didn't comment on it because I didn't believe it. I read one Omar Tyree book and have read every single one since, even though there are a couple that weren't my favorites. I've only read one of yours and never went looking for more. Are you a better writer than him? Absolutely not. Is he a better business man? Well, he seems to be taking more time to find beneficial ways to expand his publications instead of grumbling about the "lowly" self-published writer.

6:36 PM, March 11, 2007  
Anonymous said...

Some of the "self-published"
writer's on this message board
have issues . . . It's just one
person's opinion. I'm curious as to what people think of associatedcontent.com?

Also, to Mat Johnson,
you say that you don't
believe in getting an
MFA? Am I not mistaken
that you have an MFA?
Did you find that it
helped, hurt your career?

Discussions on this
message board are
lively and engaging :)

11:32 PM, April 07, 2007  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home