Thursday, May 17, 2007

Uncle Ralph


It's impossible to overstate the impact that Ralph Ellison's legacy has on African American literary writing, and African American male literary writing in particular. Even if there was a hypothetical black male writer who never read Invisible Man in his life, his writing would still be interpreted through the shadow of Ellison. Every black male who publishes a literary fiction novel deals with the promotional mantel of "The Next Ralph Ellison," and has reviews that judge it against the critics' understanding of Ellison's text. That's just the way it is.

It's not that I see Invisible Man as a perfect creation: it takes too long to get out of the south, you don't even get to see Ras's final battle firsthand, and of course there's that ending. But with Invisible Man, Ralph Ellison created the idea of the black intellectual novel. Ralph Ellison is the patriarch of black literary fiction. One of the most enjoyable conversations in my life consisted of Percival Everett and I quoting scenes and characters in Invisible Man back in forth to prove our points as if it was a biblical text.

One of the attractions of the literary life is the chance at immortality, that by creating works that endure, a writer too can endure in the minds of readers long after his or her lifetime. Admittedly, this is a pretty pathetic form of immortality: even if you become a legend you're still dead, and even Shakespeare will one day be dust when the blink of human existence is over. But it's better than just dying, right?

Maybe not. Unfortunately, living on through your work means that your life remains fair game for investigation, analysis and general use in the public discourse. No matter how unflattering or personal your issue or secret, if your a big enough author someday a dusty academic might be pulling out your dirty laundry for all to see. And the deeper and more personal they go, the more that biographer will be heralded. And now it's Ralph Ellison's turn for literary exhumation, in the first major biography of the man since his 1994 death.

Stanford's Arnold Rampersad, an extremely gifted historian best known for his two volume biography of Langston Hughes, has spent the last few years turning his attention to the equally large figure on the prose side of 20th century African American literature. The result of Rampersad's efforts are reviewed here in The New York Times, as well as dissected here in great detail by New Yorker staff writer Hilton Als. From both accounts, the image that results of Ralph Ellison the man is largely unflattering: a narcissistic, selfish, philandering snob obsessed with the white elite to the point that it tragically distanced him from his own blackness.

I'm sure the Rampersad book is amazing; I enjoyed his Hughes work. But I don't know is if I'll be able to bring myself to read it. It reminds me of that infamous diss of Martin Amis's last novel: "It's like your favourite uncle being caught in a school playground, masturbating."

And people wonder why writers are always writing memoirs and autobiographies. It's not lesser writers telling our stories that we fear. It's less sympathetic ones.

Labels:

9 Comments:

Rosanna said...

Don't worry, Mat. I'm sure that whoever gets around to writing your biography will have nothing but splendid things to say ;0)

4:57 PM, May 21, 2007  
Mat Johnson said...

My literary career barely merits a footnote on a good day. That said, I want that footnote to be nice.

No, for me this really applies to profiles, which people do on me when I get a book out. These I do to promote whatever book, but I hate them. Being defined by a stranger is absurd.

5:36 PM, May 21, 2007  
dwayne said...

mat,

im reading the biography now, right now really. i've just taken a break from reading to browse the internet. but i feel what you're saying, and then, i think that all writers can't help but to get caught up in the praise. and the praise, if it comes in the form of huge awards and the things ellison got off of invisible man can make others look at you like you're god. the biographies, whether forgiving or not, sympathetic or not, take out the idea that these dudes were gods.

i've always enjoyed them from the standpoint that less catching my grandfather masturbating, they are more catching my grandfather brushing his teeth or cutting himself while shaving.

i think, way too often, we want heroes and not people. so when the best of us go out and try to emulate the heroes, we fall up short, cause we run from whatever path we've chosen when we see our own imperfections, all the while not knowing that our heroes weren't gods.

whatever though, the hughes bio was good, so im a give rampersad the benefit of the doubt and see what's what.

dwayne

8:29 PM, May 21, 2007  
naysue said...

I thought it was interesting to explore the fact that once Ellison distanced himself from his own blackness, that this is what caused his writing to reach a stand still of sorts.

For Ellison, it seemed as though his writing talent was a gift and a curse. Once he created his literary masterpiece the first time around...I mean...where could he go from there? What do you write after a novel like I.M.? How many authors experience that exact same thing today?

The Dr. Bledsoe comparison in the NYT article was a bit much though. I wonder how Ellison would feel about that?

1:32 PM, May 22, 2007  
naysue said...

I also thought it was funny to see your post right after posting the NYT article my boyfriend sent to me earlier today. I promise I didn't bite off of you. :-)

1:33 PM, May 22, 2007  
Submariner said...

Mat, I disagree with your impression. I'm in the middle of reading Rampersad's bio and I think he gives Ellison a nuanced and sensitive portrayal. He reveals a brother who has the courage to match his ambition. He also shows us a tortured soul trying to stake his claim to western intellectual heritage without rejecting his black American folk tradition, unlike Richard Wright. I will confess that I'm simply a reader and I don't possess the literary acumen that you have. I saved the the reviews from the New York Times and Harper's until after I've done the reading. And I plan to follow up by reading Lawrence Jackson's bio of Ellison that came out in 2002.
Naysue, I will agree that Ellison was never able to follow up with another novel. But he has a fine assemblage of short stories and his collection of literary, musical, and cultural criticisms is vast and deep. These works are still relevant and fresh after all these years. He also maintained an extensive corespondence with Albert Murray that's dope. So his writing just took on a different form. I think he along with the public was expecting another James Joyce, but what we got was something else but nonetheless just as valuable and brilliant.

4:34 PM, May 22, 2007  
olufunke grace bankole said...

dwayne,

your post reminds me of an interview andrea sachs conducted with uzodinma iweala. in it, iweala relates a conversation he had with salman rushdie in which rushdie said to him, regarding literary criticism: "if you believe them when they say you're good, then you have to believe them when they say you're bad."

mat,

my thought is that a writer's life away from the page is what it is. no biographer's assessment changes what is, however unflattering/laudatory the portrayal.

10:58 PM, May 22, 2007  
Rosanna said...

Hey, you never know. Maybe one of your demented fans will write your biography and publish it on Lulu.com. And as far as biographies go, at the end of the day what difference does it make? If I really like someone's novel,and then I find out they were a big turd in their personal life I will still like their novel. I just may not want to hang out with them.

12:22 PM, May 23, 2007  
Mat Johnson said...

Thanks everyone for the points. Naysue your blog is so cool. Submarinor, I'm not sure we can disagree yet, since I'm referring solely to the reviews which you haven't read, and your referring solely to the book which I haven't read. I'm happy to hear that the book is an interesting read; I been shocked if it wasn't. Rampersad is a very talented writer.

1:10 PM, May 24, 2007  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home